Allowed¶22

N.Abdul kapoor (died) 1. a.Suriya Begam v. Kumaran Financers through its

Madras HC11 Mar 2025CMP(MD)/4146/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interlocutory order, impleading petition allowed by consent; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice P. Vadamalai; CMP(MD) No.4146 of 2025 in Review Application SR No.72630 of 2024; Abdul Kapoor (died)/Suriya Begam v. Kumaran Financiers; amendments directed; next listing 19.03.2025; interim restraint on trial court; no statutory provisions or case-law discussed.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of the proposed 2nd respondent permitted in Rev.Aplc.(MD) SR No.72630 of 2024 and connected CMPs; Registry to carry out amendments and list the matters on 19.03.2025; trial Court restrained from proceeding meanwhile. ¶22

N.Abdul kapoor (died) 1. a.Suriya Begam Vs Kumaran Financers through its — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11-03-2025

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI

¶4

CMP(MD) NO. 4146 of 2025 IN REV.APLC(MD) SR NO. 72630 of 2024

¶5

N.Abdul kapoor (Died), 1) A.Suriya Begam, W/o. N.Abdul Kapoor, 135, South Marret Street, Madurai and 6 others

¶6

(Cause title is accepted V.C.O dt 07-02-2025 made in CMP(MD) No.255/2025 in Rev. Aplc(MD) SR.No.72630/2024 by PVMJ)

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

Kumaran Financiers Through its Finance Manager Having Office at Door No.11, West Vadampokki Street, Madurai and another

Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Ramasamy

For Respondent(s):

Mr.Suresh Kumar for R2

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to implead the proposed 2^nd respondent as the 2^nd respondent in the Review Application in Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR No.72630 of 2024 and in other Civil Miscellaneous Petitions.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through Video https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/3

¶19

Conference, and I have perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶20

Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel, takes notice for the 2^nd respondent and submitted that his client has no objection to allow this petition.

¶21

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, and also considering

¶22

the fact that the 2^nd respondent has not raised any objection to allow this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶23

Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the review application and in other connected civil miscellaneous petitions and list the same on 19.03.2025.

¶24