Allowed

M.Ramasamy v. P.Pattamuthu

Madras HC7 Mar 2025CMP(MD)/1374/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to return Ex.X1 series documents marked in the joint trial of O.S.No.7 of 2009. No objection from respondents; third-party affidavit confirmed loan fully discharged. Court allowed return after substituting certified copies, with an undertaking to produce them when directed.

What did the court decide?

Registry to return Ex.X1 series to petitioner after substituting certified copies; petitioner to produce documents if ordered.

M.Ramasamy Vs P.Pattamuthu — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 1374 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NO. 1374 of 2025 IN SA(MD) NO. 766 of 2013

¶3

M.Ramasamy S/o.Mariappan Nadar, Arunachalapuram Village, Ariangyagipuram Post, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District. Petitioner(s) Vs P.Pattamuthu, S/o.Pattamuthu, Main Road, Arianayagipuram Post, Arunachalapuram Village, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District. and 8 Others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.F.X.Eugene For Respondent(s): Mr.R.T.Arivu Kumar for R1 to R9

¶4

ORDER

¶5

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to return the documents, which were marked as Ex.X1 series on the side of the plaintiff in the joint trial in O.S.No.7 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil, to the petitioner/Mr.M.Ramasamy.

¶6

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side, and I have perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition.

¶7

The learned counsel for the respondents has not raised any objection to allow https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶8

1/3

¶9

CMP(MD) NO. 1374 of 2025

¶10

this petition.

¶11

The petitioner has filed an undertaking affidavit as well as the certified copy of Ex.X1 series.

¶12

The present Secretary of Sankarankovil Co-op Primary Agriculture and

¶13

Rural Development Bank Limited, Sankarankovil has also filed a notarized third party affidavit stating that he has no objection to return the aforesaid documents to the petitioner/M.Ramasamy, since the petitioner has already discharged the entire loan amount.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.

¶15

Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Registry is directed to return the Ex.X1 series to the petitioner after substituting it with certified copies of the same on proper acknowledgment. However, the petitioner shall produce the aforesaid documents whenever specifically ordered by this Court.

¶16

sd/-

¶17

07/03/2025 / TRUE COPY /

¶18

07/03/2025

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

mkn

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

2/3

¶23

CMP(MD) NO. 1374 of 2025

¶24

¶25

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, SANKARANKOVIL. COPY TO

¶26

THE SECTION OFFICER, V.R.SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

+1 CC to M/s.F.X.EUGENE, Advocate ( SR-2506[I] dated 07/03/2025 )

¶28

ORDER IN CMP(MD) NO. 1374 of 2025 IN SA(MD) NO. 766 of 2013 Date :07/03/2025

¶29

RS/IT/SAR-(07.03.2025) 3P 4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

3/3

M.Ramasamy v. P.Pattamuthu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ramasamy v. P.Pattamuthu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anitha Vs Rengarajan

S.S. Muthaiah Vs Unnamalai Aachi

Priyanka Baskaran Vs Revanth Harikrishna

Abinaya alias Kaviya Vs S.Gopalakrishnan

T. Thomas Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Nagavalli Vs The Inspector Of Police