Allowed

Veeranan v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC11 Dec 2025CMP(MD)/19717/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A third party sought leave under Section 151 CPC to file a writ appeal against a Single Judge order permitting registration of an instrument concerning land alleged to be classified as 'Tharisu' public land. The Division Bench granted leave and directed the Registry to number and list the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Petition for leave to file writ appeal as third party allowed; Registry to number the appeal and post it for admission.

Veeranan Vs The Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.M.P.(MD) No.19717 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD) No.19717 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR No.104124 of 2025

Veeranan

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Tahsildar O/o.The Tahsildar Peraiyur Madurai District

¶11

2.The Sub Registrar Elumalai Sub-Registrar Office Elumalai Madurai District

¶12

3.P.Elango ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to grant leave to the petitioner to file a writ appeal as against the order passed by this Court, dated 16.06.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.14301 of 2025.

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.M.P.(MD) No.19717 of 2025

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R2

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

¶20

The petitioner herein seeks leave of this Court to prefer a writ appeal as against the order passed by the learned Single Judge, dated 16.06.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.14301 of 2025, on the ground that the order in the writ petition has been obtained suppressing certain vital facts with regard to the property, which is the subject matter of the instrument directed to be registered by the learned Single Judge. As a consequence thereof, the land belongs to the public and classified as “Tharisu”, by manipulation of the records and suppression of facts, has been permitted to be transferred through the instrument presented by the writ petitioner for registration.

¶21

2. Considering the nature of the grievance exposed by the petitioner herein, this civil miscellaneous petition to grant leave to the petitioner to file a writ appeal as third party as against the order passed by the

¶22

Page 2 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.M.P.(MD) No.19717 of 2025

¶25

learned Single Judge, dated 16.06.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.14301 of 2025, is allowed and the petitioner herein is granted leave to prefer a writ appeal as third party as against the said order.

¶26

3. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the same for admission in the usual course.

¶27

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]

¶28

11.12.2025

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶30

krk

¶31

To: 1.The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

¶32

2.The Sub Registrar, Elumalai Sub-Registrar Office, Elumalai,

¶33

Madurai District.

¶34

Page 3 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.M.P.(MD) No.19717 of 2025

¶37

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

¶38

krk

¶39

C.M.P.(MD) No.19717 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR No.104124 of 2025

¶40

11.12.2025

¶41

_____________ Page 4 of 4_

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Veeranan v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veeranan v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marimuthu Vs the Area Manager

V.Aravinth Vs The Principal Secretary to the Government

Paruk Vs The Authorised Officer

Annamalaiar Mills Ltd. Vs a.G.Shankar

Rabbani Vs Saravanan

N.Kumar Vs The District Collector