Allowed¶32

Rabbani v. Saravanan

Condonation of delay – Common order

Madras HC11 Dec 2025CMP(MD)/8722/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; C.M.P.(MD) Nos.8722 & 8723 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR Nos.45546 & 45547 of 2025; Rabbani vs Saravanan / Nagaraj and District Revenue Officer, Revenue Divisional Officer, Tahsildar Manamadurai Taluk (Sivagangai District); condonation of delay of 53 days in filing writ appeals; Section 5 of Limitation Act; petitions allowed; Registry to number writ appeals and list for admission; Coram: DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. (author) and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.; decided 11.12.2025; no counter affidavit, first respondents unrepresented.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 53 days in filing the writ appeals (W.A.(MD) SR Nos.45546 & 45547 of 2025) condoned; Registry directed to number the writ appeals if papers are otherwise in order and post them for admission in the usual course. ¶32

Rabbani Vs Saravanan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.8722 & 8723 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.8722 & 8723 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) SR Nos.45546 & 45547 of 2025

¶7

C.M.P.(MD) No.8722 of 2025:

¶8

Rabbani ... Petitioner

¶9

-vs-

¶10

1.Saravanan

¶11

2.The District Revenue Officer O/o.The District Revenue Office Sivagangai District

¶12

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.the Revenue Divisional Office Sivagangai-630 561

¶13

4.The Tahsildar Manamadurai Taluk Sivagangai District ... Respondents

¶14

_____________ Page 1 of 5_

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.8722 & 8723 of 2025

¶17

PRAYER:

¶18

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the above writ appeal.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Neelamegam For Respondents : No appearance for R1 Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R2 to R4

¶20

C.M.P.(MD) No.8723 of 2025:

¶21

Rabbani ... Petitioner

¶22

-vs1.Nagaraj 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.the Revenue Divisional Office Sivagangai-630 561 3.The Tahsildar Manamadurai Taluk Sivagangai District ... Respondents

¶23

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the above writ appeal.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Neelamegam For Respondents : No appearance for R1 Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R2 & R3

¶25

_____________ Page 2 of 5_

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.8722 & 8723 of 2025

¶28

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶29

[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.]

¶30

These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 53 days in the filing the above writ appeals.

¶31

2. There is no representation for the first respondents and no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents.

¶32

3. Hence, considering the grounds of appeal and the reasons stated for in accompanying affidavit for the delay, these civil miscellaneous petitions are allowed and the delay of 53 days in filing the above writ appeals are condoned.

¶33

3. Registry is directed to number the writ appeals, if the papers are otherwise in order, and post the same for admission in the usual course.

¶34

[G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.] 11.12.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk

¶35

Page 3 of 5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

C.M.P.(MD) Nos.8722 & 8723 of 2025

¶38

To: