Allowed¶17

J. Jebastine Raja Kumar v. The Secretary

Madras HC24 Nov 2025CMP(MD)/17907/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Impleading petition allowed; third-party beneficiary of order in WP(MD) No.516/2018 held to be proper and necessary party to writ appeal WA(MD) No.1240/2020; approval of appointment as Junior Assistant w.e.f. 12.02.2018; school management versus educational authorities (School Education, Tamil Nadu); Registry directed to amend cause title; Madurai Bench, Madras High Court; R. Vijayakumar, J.; C.V. Karthikeyan, J.; dated 24-11-2025.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of the petitioner as a respondent in the writ appeal; Registry directed to carry out necessary amendment. ¶17

J. Jebastine Raja Kumar Vs The Secretary — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 17907 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-11-2025

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶5

CMP(MD) NO. 17907 of 2025 in WA(MD) No.1240/2020

¶6

J. Jebastine Raja Kumar S/o. R. Joseph 9/47-1 Anna Nagar 3rd Street Alangulam - 627 851 Tirunevleli District.

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The Secretary, Department of School Education State of Tamil Nadu Secretariat Fort St George Chennai - 9. 2. The Director of School Education DPI Campus Chennai - 6. 3. The Chief Educational Officer Tirunelveli. 4. TheDistrict Educational Officer Tenkasi Tirunelveli District. 5. West Triunelveli Higher Secondary School Nallur - 627853 Represented by its Correspondent Mr. M. Ponraj Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.A. Ebenezer For Respondent(s): Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam for R2 to R4 Government Advocate

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Prayer:To Implead the petitioner herein as Respondent No. 2 in the Writ Petition in W.A. (MD) No. 1249 of 2020.

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(Order of the Court was made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.)

¶14

This petition has been filed by a third party to the writ appeal seeking to implead himself in the writ appeal.

¶15

A perusal of the record indicates that the school management had filed WP(MD) No.516/2018 seeking to quash the order passed by the educational authorities and to approve the appointment of the present impleading petitioner as Junior Assistant with effect from 12.02.2018. Challenging the same, the educational authorities have preferred writ appeal.

¶16

The impleading petitioner now apprehends that the management may not properly defending the writ appeal and therefore, he wants himself to be impleaded as a respondent in the writ appeal.

¶17

Considering the fact that an order has been passed in favour of the impleading petitioner in the writ petition, for whom the writ petition was filed by the management and a direction has been issued, we find that the impleading petitioner is not only proper party but also necessary party. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment.

¶18

(C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J.) (R.VIJAYAKUMAR J.) 24-11-2025

¶19

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

To1. The Secretary, Department of School Education State of Tamil Nadu Secretariat Fort St George Chennai - 9.

¶22