Allowed

P.S.Shahul Hameed v. M.R.Abdul Jaffer

Madras HC24 Nov 2025CMP(MD)/16281/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to condone a 64-day delay in filing an appeal suit against a judgment decree from the Additional District Court, Tenkasi, citing delay in obtaining the order copy and need to raise funds. Notice served on the first respondent; the court allowed the petition and condoned the delay.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 64 days condoned; Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order.

P.S.Shahul Hameed Vs M.R.Abdul Jaffer — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CMP(MD) NO. 16281 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶3

CMP(MD) NO. 16281 of 2025 IN AS(MD) SR NO. 78580 OF 2025

¶4

P.S.Shahul Hameed S/o.Late.Samsudeen No.54 Big Street Kadayanallur Taluk Tenkasi District.

¶5

Petitioner(s)

¶6

¶7

M.R.Abdul Jaffer S/o.Rahmathulla No.263-B /30D Rahmaniyapuram 3rd Street Kadayanallur Taluk Tenkasi District. Represented by through his Power Agent V.M.Nathahar Badhusha S/o.Mydeen Kutty Mohammed Door No.245/2A Rahmaniyapuram 4th West North Street Kadayanallur Taluk Tenkasi District.

¶8

S.Kamarunisha Begam W/o.P.Shahul Hameed Door No.54 Big Street Kadayanallur Taluk Tenkasi District.

¶9

U.M.Abdul Rasak S/o.Late.Mohammed Kasim Sahib Door No.23 Kani Textiles 1st Floor North Ayyapuram Street Kadayanallur Taluk Tenkasi District.

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For Respondent(s): M/s.P.Saravanan for R1

¶13

Prayer:To condone the delay of 64 days in filing the appeal suit against the judgment decree dated 18-03-2025 passed in O.S.No.154 of 2020 on the file of Additional District Court, Tenkasi District.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)

¶16

This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 64 days in filing the appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2025 in OS No.154/2020 on the file of the Additional District Court at Tenkasi.

¶17

In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it had been stated that the copy

¶18

application was made on 26.03.2025, though the judgment had been pronounced on 18.03.2025. The order copy was delivered on 22.04.2025.

¶19

The appellant stated that he had to raise necessary funds to prepare and file the appeal suit.

¶20

Notice had been directed. The learned counsel had entered appearance on behalf of the first respondent/plaintiff.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Having heard both the learned counsels, the petition is allowed and the delay is

¶23

condoned. Registry to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.

¶24

(C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J.) (R.VIJAYAKUMAR J.) 24-11-2025

¶25

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.S.Shahul Hameed v. M.R.Abdul Jaffer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.S.Shahul Hameed v. M.R.Abdul Jaffer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Santhoos Mary Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Chellappan, Vs M.Manikandan

R.Ganesamoorthy, Vs M.Govindarajan

Sindhu Bairavi Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Vs S. Kasthuri Bai

J. Jebastine Raja Kumar Vs The Secretary