Allowed¶24

Bhawari Bhai v. M.S.Mohamed Yousuf

Madras HC13 Mar 2025CMP/6814/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court CMP 6814/2024 in CRP 1203/2021; Justice N. Senthilkumar; order dated 13-03-2025; Bhawari Bhai v M.S.Mohamed Yousuf and E.Sridharan; amendment of cause title; removal of cancelled power agent M. Ravi; short procedural order; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Amendment of the cause title permitted; Registry directed to carry out the amendment and list the civil revision petition in the usual course. ¶24

Bhawari Bhai Vs M.S.Mohamed Yousuf — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CMP NO.6814 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶5

CMP NO. 6814 of 2024

¶6

¶7

CRP NO. 1203 OF 2021

¶8

Bhawari Bhai

¶9

No.27, Wall Tax Road, Chennai 600 079.

Appellant(s)

M.S.Mohamed Yousuf

154, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai 600 001, By Power Agent M.Ravi 29, Thiruvengadasamy Street, Saligramam, Chennai. and another

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Mahendran for M/s.MCGAN Law Firm For Respondent(s): Me.V.Govardhan for R2

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The present civil miscellaneous petition is filed to amend the cause title by removing the name and address of the Power Agent of the 1st respondent and to incorporate Mr.M.S.Mohammed Yousuf, 154, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai - 600 001 instead of M.S.Mohammed Yousuf, 154, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai - 600 001,

¶18

represented by Power Agent M.Ravi, 29, Thiruvengadasamy Street, Saligramam,

¶19

Chennai.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner contends that the first respondent is the owner of the property, whereas the second respondent is the

¶22

agreement holder. The amendment was sought to replace the power agent, whose

¶23

power was cancelled by the first respondent. Despite service of notice and private notice on the first respondent and his name also reflects in the cause list, no one appears for the first respondent. The second respondent has no objection for allowing the petition.

¶24

Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous petition is allowed in the above terms. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title and list the civil revision petition in the usual course.

13-03-2025

Asr