Thanjammal v. v. Panjalai
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC to set aside abatement of a second appeal caused by the death of the second appellant. Respondents' counsel raised no objection; the court found the affidavit reasons satisfactory and allowed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Abatement caused by the death of the 2nd appellant in S.A.No.195 of 2020 was set aside; legal heirs permitted to be substituted.
What the court decided
CMP.No.21713 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
CMP.No.21713 of 2025
in
S.A.No.195 of 2020
1.Thanjammal Jayaraman (died) 2.Rani 3.J.Siva 4.J.Kannan 5.Vanaja ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.V.Panjalai 2.V.Perumal 3.V.Kandan
4.V.Sudhakar ...Respondents Prayer :
Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of Civil
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the abatement of S.A.No.195 of 2020 caused by the death of the second appellant should be set aside to permit substitution of his legal representatives.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thanjammal Jayaraman (died)
- petitioner
Rani
- petitioner
J.Siva
- petitioner
J.Kannan
- petitioner
Vanaja
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court