Bala Tourist Service v. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Madras HC12 Sept 2025CMP/16632/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condone delay petition allowed; Madras High Court; Justice K. Rajasekar; C.M.P. No.16632 of 2025 in Rev. Appl. Sr.No.12415 of 2025; Bala Tourist Service v. Employees State Insurance Corporation; 122 days delay condoned in representing review application against order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.2020 of 2021; Order 4 Rule (9) 4 of A.S. Rules; respondent counsel raised no objections; decision dated 12.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the delay of 122 days in representing Review Application Sr.No.12415 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.2020 of 2021; the CMP is allowed. ¶¶21

Bala Tourist Service Vs Employees State Insurance Corporation — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P. No.16632 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.09.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

¶6

C.M.P. No.16632 of 2025 in Rev. Appl. Sr.No.12415 of 2025

¶7

Bala Tourist Service, Bala House, No.88-A, MGR Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034, Rep. by its Partner B. Pradeep ... Petitioner/ Applicant/ Respondent

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Employees State Insurance Corporation, 143, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034, Rep. by its Deputy Director. ... Respondent/ Respondent/ Appellant

¶10

Prayer: This condone delay petition is filed under Order 4 Rule (9) 4 of A.S. Rules to condone the delay of 122 days in representing this review Application Sr.No.12415 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.2020 of 2021.

¶11

For Respondent : Mr. Bharadwaj

¶12

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.M.P. No.16632 of 2025

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This condone delay petition is filed to condone the delay of 122 days in representing this review Application Sr.No.12415 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.2020 of 2021.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the

¶19

records.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent present and raised no objections.

¶21

Having accepted the reasons stated in the affidavit, filed in support of the petition, the delay of 122 days in representing this review Application Sr.No.12415 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.2020 of 2021 is condoned. Accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed.

¶22

12.09.2025

¶23

stn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

C.M.P. No.16632 of 2025

¶27

To: