Bala Tourist Service v. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Madras HC12 Sept 2025CMP/16616/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay petition allowed; delay of 122 days in representing review application; Rev. Appl. Sr.No.12416 of 2025; order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.1813 of 2021; Order 4 Rule (9)4 of A.S. Rules; Bala Tourist Service; B. Pradeep; Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC); Deputy Director; M/s. Agam Legal; Bharadwaj; Madras High Court; Justice K. Rajasekar; decision date 12.09.2025; respondent counsel raised no objections; reasons in affidavit accepted.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the delay of 122 days in representing Review Application Sr.No.12416 of 2025. ¶¶24

Bala Tourist Service Vs Employees State Insurance Corporation — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

C.M.P. No.16616 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.09.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

¶6

C.M.P. No.16616 of 2025 in

¶7

Rev. Appl. Sr.No.12416 of 2025

¶8

Bala Tourist Service, Bala House, No.132, Kodambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034, Rep. by its Partner B. Pradeep ... Petitioner/ Applicant/ Respondent

¶9

Vs.

¶10

Employees State Insurance Corporation, 143, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034, Rep. by its Deputy Director. ... Respondent/ Respondent/ Appellant

¶11

Prayer: This condone delay petition is filed under Order 4 Rule (9)4 of A.S. Rules to condone the delay of 122 days in representing this review Application Sr.No.12416 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.1813 of 2021.

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s. Agam Legal For Respondent : Mr. Bharadwaj

ORDER

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.M.P. No.16616 of 2025

¶18

This condone delay petition is filed to condone the delay of 122 days

¶19

in representing this review Application Sr.No.12416 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.1813 of 2021.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the

¶21

records.

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent present and raised no objections.

¶23

Having accepted the reasons stated in the affidavit, filed in

¶24

support of the petition, the delay of 122 days in representing this review Application Sr.No.12416 of 2025 against the order dated 11.07.2024 in C.M.A.No.1813 of 2021 is condoned. Accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed.

¶25

12.09.2025

¶26

stn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

C.M.P. No.16616 of 2025

¶30

To: