Allowed¶25

Kannan v. S.V. Ramachandran(Died)

Madras HC23 Oct 2025AS(MD)/130/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Return of original exhibits/documents after settlement by Joint Memo of Compromise; substituted true copies retained in Court records; Ex.A2, Ex.A4, Ex.B5, Ex.B7 sale deeds returned; A.S.(MD)No.130 of 2018; appeal under Section 96 C.P.C from O.S.No.18 of 2004, Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram; substitution of legal representatives on death of R1; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; order dated 29.10.2025; C.V.Karthikeyan and R.Vijayakumar JJ.

What did the court decide?

Return of original exhibits Ex.A2, Ex.A4, Ex.B5 and Ex.B7 to the parties, with substituted true copies retained in the Court records after acknowledgment from the learned counsel for the respondents. ¶25

Kannan Vs S.V. Ramachandran(Died) — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.S.(MD)No.130 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 29.10.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

A.S.(MD)No.130 of 2018

¶7

Kannan ... Appellant

¶8

-vs-

¶9

1.S.V.Ramachandran (Died) Sarasuwathi (Died) 2.Jeyaraman 3.Murugesh 4.Sangaiya 5.Selvam ... Respondents

¶10

(The death of R1 is recorded and the respondents 2 to 5 are brought on record as the legal representatives of R1 vide Court Order dated 23.10.2025)

¶11

PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2018 passed in O.S.No.18 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram.

¶12

For Appellant : Mr.M.Mohamed Ibrahim Sabu for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramesh

¶13

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

A.S.(MD)No.130 of 2018

¶16

ORDER

¶17

(Order of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan , J . )

¶18

This Court recorded the Joint Memo of Compromise presented by the appellant and the respondents 2 to 5 and had disposed of the appeal suit by judgment dated 23.10.2025 in accordance with the Joint Memo of Compromise. In this Joint Memo of Compromise, it has also been agreed by the parties that Ex.A2 and Ex.A4 which had been filed by the plaintiff/appellant in O.S.No.18 of 2004 shall be returned to the respondents/defendants.

¶19

2.This memo has now been presented seeking return of two documents namely Ex.A2 which is sale deed dated 01.11.1974 and Ex.A4 which is sale deed dated 06.12.1976. Additionally, in the memo, request is also placed for return of Ex.B5 which is sale deed dated 10.06.1998 and Ex.B7 which is sale deed dated 24.11.1976. The exhibits B5 and B7 had been filed by the respondents in the appeal. The Joint Memo of Compromise has been effected and parties agreed, particularly, the respondents/defendants, the documents filed by the respondents could be handed over to them.

¶20

_____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

A.S.(MD)No.130 of 2018

¶23

Learned counsel for the appellant is also present.

¶24

The said memo is recorded. Registry is directed to return

¶25

the Ex.A2, Ex.A4, Ex.B5 and Ex.B7 and substituted true copies of the same may be retained in the Court records after getting necessary acknowledgment from the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶26

[C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 29.10.2025

¶27

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/No am

¶28

¶29