reply notice has been given by the first defendant on 05.07.2016. The defendants family has a loan of about Rs.40,00,000/- and hence, they were trying to sell the suit property to the plaintiff's husband Senthilkumar orally undertook to repay the debtors of the defendants. Hence, the sale agreement has entered into loan that day no money transactions took place between them. Even though, the said sale agreement was registered, it is to be only a security for repaying the loan amount and the same cannot be legally accepted. When the defendants along with attestors and the panchayatars to the document, have approached the plaintiff and her husband to settle the loan amount, they have refused. The plaintiff and her husband were running a monthly chit and they do not have capacity to pay Rs.15,00,000/-. Only on the belief that as they are running a monthly chit, the plaintiff would settle the loan amount, for which, the said sale agreement was entered into. If the plaintiff settles the loan amount towards one Mariappan and 21 others, the defendants are ready to execute the sale deed in favour of the