This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AS No. 101 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-08-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
AS No. 101 of 2020
2.Chandrakala
3.Sri Balakrishnan
4.Valarmathy
Appellant(s)
Vs
2.M.Kamalam @ M.Kamalathal
3.Saraswathy
4.D.R.Jeganathan
5.V.Murugan
6.K.Thiruvasagam
Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This appeal has been filed under Section 96 of CPC, t o set aside the judgment and decree dated 30-09-2010 passed in OS NO.28 of 2008 on the file of Additioinal District Judge, Fast Track Court No.V, Tiruppur.
AS No. 101 of 2020
M.JOTHIRAMAN J.
rli
For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s. S.Kingston Jerold For R1 And R2 R3, 5 & R6 - Dismissed Vide Court Order Dt.20/02/2023
JUDGMENT
The appeal suit has been filed seeking to quash the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed in OS. No.28 of 2008 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, FTC-V, Tiruppur.
3. Even Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this appeal suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
08-08-2025
Rli
To
Additional District Judge, FTC-V, Tiruppur.
AS No. 101 of 2020
AS No. 101 of 2020
1 issue framed by the court
Should the appeal suit be dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ammani Ammal
Chandrakala
Sri Balakrishnan
Valarmathy
S.Deivathal @ Ammaniammal
M.Kamalam @ M.Kamalathal
M.Jothiraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
