Tata Capital Ltd. v. Sankar S and another
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Arb Appln No. 403 of 2024, decided 06.03.2025 by Abdul Quddhose J. Tata Capital Ltd (applicant/appellant) sought repossession of a vehicle through an Advocate Commissioner appointed by order dated 22.07.2024 against respondents Sankar S and another. Vehicle could not be located; multiple time extensions granted; application closed with liberty to file a fresh application upon location of the vehicle. Counsel: N.K. Vanan for appellant; R. Murugan (Advocate Commissioner) shown for respondent. No statutes or precedents discussed; no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
Application closed; liberty granted to the applicant to file a fresh application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle once the vehicle is located, with an indication that the same Advocate Commissioner may be retained.