Tata Capital Ltd. v. Mausam Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration application closed — Advocate Commissioner appointed on 22.07.2024 to repossess a vehicle from the respondent could not locate the vehicle despite five extensions of time (last on 23.01.2025); application closed as further pendency would serve no purpose, with liberty to file a fresh application once the vehicle is located and an indication that the same Commissioner (initial remuneration already paid) may be retained. High Court of Judicature at Madras, Arb Appln No. 402 of 2024, order dated 06-03-2025, Abdul Quddhose, J. Applicant: Tata Capital Ltd; Respondent: Mausam Babu. No statutory provisions or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Application closed; liberty granted to the applicant to file a fresh application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle once it is located, with an indication that the same Advocate Commissioner may be retained.