Allowed¶23

S. Peter and another v. Loordhu Ammal Educational trust and 6 others

Madras HC25 Aug 2025A/4103/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 92 CPC leave granted; public charitable/educational trust; reconstitution of trust; trustees' family arrangement; third trust formed 23.03.2019; Judges Summons; Madras High Court; C.V. Karthikeyan J.; A No.4103 of 2025 in C.S.DR.No.64224 of 2025; Loordhu Ammal Educational Trust; suit numbering direction.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to the applicants/plaintiffs to file a suit against the respondents/defendants under Section 92 of the C.P.C.; Registry directed to number the suit if otherwise in order. ¶23

S. Peter and another Vs Loordhu Ammal Educational trust and 6 others — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A NO.4103 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-08-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN A No.4103 of 2025 in

¶5

C.S.DR.No.64224 of 2025

¶6

S. Peter and another S/o.Late Soosaiya Pillai, Residing at No.15, Verghese Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai 600 083. and another

¶7

Applicant(s)

¶8

¶9

Loordhu Ammal Educational trust and 6 others Rep.by its Trustee, Mrs.P.Josephin Rosy, Having Office at 1A Chari Street, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. and 6 Others

¶10

Respondent(s)

¶11

For Applicant(s):

¶12

Mr.S.Rajmakesh

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This application has been filed seeking grant of leave to the

¶15

applicants / plaintiffs to file a suit against the Respondents/defendants under Section 92 of C.P.C.,

¶16

In the affidavit filed in support of the Judges Summons, it had

¶17

been contended that the respondents Trust have been framed primarily to offer education in colleges and other educational institutions have also

¶18

C.V. KARTHIKEYAN,J.,

¶19

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

A NO.4103 of 2025

¶22

vum

¶23

been established under the first and second respondent Trust. The third Trust had also been formed on 23.03.2019 with similar objects. It had been stated that the trustees of the first and second respondent Trust along with family members had unanimously agreed to manage the allotted institutions. It is stated that in accordance with such agreement which had now been entered into among the family members, reconstitution of the Trust is required. It had been stated that this would require institution of a suit under Section 92 of the C.P.C., Leave is sought and leave is granted.

¶24