Dismissed

Rajan Tennyson v. the Regional Passport Officer

Madras HC6 Mar 2024WP(MD)/9324/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 to quash a passport notice and direct reissue. During hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the writ as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Rajan Tennyson Vs the Regional Passport… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.9324 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 06.03.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.9324 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)No.7049 of 2021

Rajan Tennyson

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai – 625 002.

¶11

The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, Munneerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.345 of 2020)

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice in letter Ref.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD)No.9324 of 2021

¶18

No.SCN/310797415/21 dated 24.03.2020 passed by the first respondent and quash the same as illegal, consequently directing the first respondent to reissue the passport to the petitioner forthwith based on his application in File No.MD2073332104521 dated 18.03.2021.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Manimaran

¶20

For R1 : No appearance For R2 & R3 : M/s.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice in Letter Ref. No.SCN/310797415/21 dated 24.03.2020 passed by the first respondent and quash the same, consequently direct the first respondent to reissue the passport to the petitioner forthwith based on his application in File No.MD2073332104521 dated 18.03.2021.

¶23

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned

¶24

counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P(MD)No.9324 of 2021

¶28

to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶29

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶30

06.03.2024

¶31

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm

¶32

¶33

The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli.

¶34

The Inspector of Police, Munneerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶35

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P(MD)No.9324 of 2021

¶39

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J

¶40

csm

¶41

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.9324 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)No.7049 of 2021

¶42

Dated : 06.03.2024

¶43

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rajan Tennyson v. the Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan Tennyson v. the Regional Passport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thoubeek Raja.N Vs the Commissioner

Sundar Raj Vs Banu

Servaran Vs Mariammal

Senthur Pandian.P Vs the District Collector

Veeramanikandan.P Vs the Manager Marketing and Service

M/S.Arjun Pulp and Papers (I) Private Limited, Vs Visakan Impex