Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a matrimonial original petition; counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw with an endorsement, and the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1966 of 2019
Servaran ... Petitioner/ Respondent/ Petitioner
Vs.
Mariammal ... Respondent/ Petitioner/ Respondent
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No. 126 of 2018 dated 22.11.2018 in H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2017 on the file of the Sub Court, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Indrachithu
1/4
C.R.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in I.A.No.126 of 2018 in H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2017 dated 22.11.2018 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sankarankovil.
04.03.2024
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm
C.R.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019
To
C.R.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
csm
Order made in C.R.P.(MD)No.393 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1966 of 2019
Dated : 04.03.2024
Servaran
Mariammal
K. Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
