Deivanai v. The Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged alleged police harassment. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the enquiry was conducted and closed. The Court recorded the submission and closed the writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.7239 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.04.2024
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD) No.7239 of 2024
Deivanai ... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Superintendent of Police Dindigul, Dindigul District.
- 2.The Inspector of Police Nilakottai Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.
3.Ramesh ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No.2 not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere into a civil dispute based on the petitioner's representation dated 16.03.2024 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was being harassed by the police under the guise of an enquiry?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deivanai
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police Dindigul, Dindigul District
- respondent
The Inspector of Police Nilakottai Police Station, Nilakottai, Dindigul District
- respondent
Ramesh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court