Dismissed

Tvl v. Vairam Contractor v The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Madras HC14 Mar 2024WP(MD)/5937/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the Madurai Bench dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of an assessment order, noting that an appeal remedy was available before the appellate authority. The petitioner was granted liberty to file the appeal within two weeks. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; liberty to file appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks of receipt of this order.

Tvl v Vairam Contractor Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.5937 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 14.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.5937 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.5581 and 5582 of 2024

¶7

Tvl.V.Vairam Contractor, Rep. by its Proprietor V.Vairam, No.1/149A, Srivilliputhur Road, Sivakasi West, Samyanatham, Virudhunagar – 626 141.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sivakasi – I Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, N.G.O.Colony, Satchiyapuram, Sivakasi – 626 124, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned assessment order on the file of respondent vide RETS/33AHJPV9923H1ZU/2020-21 dated 03.05.2023 and quash the

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD)No.5937 of 2024

¶15

same as illegal and devoid of merits and direct the respondent to redo the assessment proceedings for the year 2020-2021.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This writ petition is filed as against the assessment order dated 03.05.2023, passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2020-2021.

¶19

Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader, who

¶20

takes notice for the respondent, submits that as against the assessment order dated 03.05.2023, the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the appellate authority.

¶21

Since the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the

¶22

appellate authority, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority, within a 2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.5937 of 2024

¶25

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise all these grounds before the appellate authority. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶26

14.03.2024

¶27

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. ogy To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sivakasi – I Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, N.G.O.Colony, Satchiyapuram, Sivakasi – 626 124, Virudhunagar District.

¶28

3/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.5937 of 2024

¶31

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶32

ogy

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.5937 of 2024

¶34

14.03.2024

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tvl v. Vairam Contractor v The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl v. Vairam Contractor v The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Ibrahim Oli Vs The Managing Director

Arulmigu Karpaga Vinayagar Temple Vs The Joint Commissioner

P Ramkumar Vs The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

Tvl v Vairam Contractor Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

M/s. Growlam Office Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of Customs

Tvl v Vairam Contractor Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)