Dismissed

Tvl v. Vairam Contractor v The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Madras HC14 Mar 2024WP(MD)/5936/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed a writ petition challenging an assessment order for the year 2018-19. The High Court held that since an appeal remedy was available to the petitioner, the writ was not maintainable, dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.

Tvl v Vairam Contractor Vs The Assistant Commissioner… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.5936 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 14.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.5936 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.5576 and 5578 of 2024

¶7

Tvl.V.Vairam Contractor, Rep. by its Proprietor V.Vairam, No.1/149A, Srivilliputhur Road, Sivakasi West, Samyanatham, Virudhunagar – 626 141.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sivakasi – I Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, N.G.O.Colony, Satchiyapuram, Sivakasi – 626 124, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned assessment order on the file of respondent vide RETS/33AHJPV9923H1ZU/2018-19 dated 03.05.2023 and quash the

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD)No.5936 of 2024

¶15

same as illegal and devoid of merits and direct the respondent to redo the assessment proceedings for the year 2018-2019

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This writ petition is filed as against the assessment order dated 03.05.2023, passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2018-2019.

¶19

Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader, who

¶20

takes notice for the respondent, submits that as against the assessment order dated 03.05.2023, the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the appellate authority.

¶21

Since the petitioner is having an appeal remedy before the

¶22

appellate authority, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority, within a 2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.5936 of 2024

¶25

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise all these grounds before the appellate authority. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶26

14.03.2024

¶27

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. ogy To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sivakasi – I Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, N.G.O.Colony, Satchiyapuram, Sivakasi – 626 124, Virudhunagar District.

¶28

3/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.5936 of 2024

¶31

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶32

ogy

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.5936 of 2024

¶34

14.03.2024

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tvl v. Vairam Contractor v The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl v. Vairam Contractor v The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Ibrahim Oli Vs The Managing Director

Arulmigu Karpaga Vinayagar Temple Vs The Joint Commissioner

P Ramkumar Vs The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

Tvl v Vairam Contractor Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

M/s. Growlam Office Private Limited Vs The Commissioner of Customs

Tvl v Vairam Contractor Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)