3. The learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the petitioner failed to prove that the share of his mother was settled in his favour. The petitioner was gifted in respect of his mother's share by oral Hiba. On the strength of the unregistered oral Hiba, no document can be registered. The second respondent is duty bound to register the document by examining the identity of the parties, sufficiency of stamp duty, payment of registration of charges, and also production of patta in the name of the vendor. He cannot go into the title over the property, while presenting the document for registration. Further, the property does not come under the provision under Sections 22 A and 22 B of amended Registration Act, to refuse the registration. Admittedly, the petitioner's mother is bedridden and aged about 89 years. Further, the subject property originally belongs to his father and he died leaving behind the petitioner and his mother as his legal heirs, to succeed his properties. However, there is no rival claim over the subject property, after Hiba in respect of 1/8 th share of the subject property by his mother. It was recorded by way of memorandum of recording the Hiba by his mother and attested by the Notary Public and witnessed by two witnesses. The Oral Hiba under Mohammedan Law, the oral Hiba does
