Dismissed

Sikkandar v. The Sub Registrar

Madras HC5 Nov 2024WP(MD)/2729/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged refusal to register a settlement deed executed by his mother. Court relied on precedents and directed the Sub-Registrar to register the deed after conducting a fresh enquiry on merits following a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Diecting the Respondent to register the settlement deed after conducting a fresh enquiry in light of cited precedent and passing orders on merits.

Sikkandar Vs The Sub Registrar — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P (MD).No.2729 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P (MD).Nos.2729 of 2024

Sikkandar

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Sub-Registrar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the Impugned Refusal Check Slip in RFL/Paramakudi/14/2023 dated 03.05.2023 of the respondent and quash the same and further directing the respondent to receive and register the settlement deed dated 18.04.2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondent : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip, dated 03.05.2023, on the file of the respondent.

¶16

1/5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P (MD).No.2729 of 2024

¶19

The petitioner's mother had executed a settlement deed in his

¶20

favour in respect of the subject property. After execution of the settlement deed, his mother passed away on 04.01.2024. Thereafter, the settlement deed dated 18.04.2023 was presented for registration before the respondent. However, the respondent refused to register the same by issuance of refusal check slip on the ground that the patta stands in the name of the settlor namely the petitioner's father. Further, the subject property is a water catchment area.

¶21

The duty of the Sub-Registrar has been dealt with in a detailed

¶22

manner by this Court in W.P.11056 of 2024, dated 26.04.2024 in the case of Subramani Vs. Sub-Registrar and others .

¶23

Therefore, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent to conduct fresh enquiry in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P. 11056 of 2024, dated 26.04.2024 in the case of Subramani Vs. Sub-Registrar and others and pass orders on the settlement deed presented by the petitioner for registration.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/5

¶26

W.P (MD).No.2729 of 2024

¶27

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to represent the settlement deed for registration executed by his mother and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry in the light of the judgment of this Court in W.P.11056 of 2024, dated 26.04.2024 in the case of Subramani Vs. Sub-Registrar and others and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶28

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶29

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order am

¶30

05.11.2024

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/5

¶33

W.P (MD).No.2729 of 2024

¶34

¶35

The Sub-Registrar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

4/5

¶38

W.P (MD).No.2729 of 2024

¶39

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶40

¶41

W.P (MD).No.2729 of 2024

¶42

05.11.2024

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

5/5

Sikkandar v. The Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikkandar v. The Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Dharmasamvarthini Vs the District Collector

Maharaja Vs the District Collector

M.Mohamed Akbar, Vs the Senior Divisional

Kalimuthu a Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Arjunan Vs The Sub-Registrar

Poomari Malaisamy.M Vs Union of India Represented by the Secretary