Dismissed

K.Selvaraj, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC22 Oct 2024WP(MD)/5215/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ to quash proceedings and obtain a patta for lands. The court held that since the patta had already been issued pursuant to a Civil Court decree, no further orders were required.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

K.Selvaraj, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.5215 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.5215 of 2018 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)No.5198 of 2018

K.Selvaraj

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶12

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Thiruvengadam Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

3.The Village Administrative Officer, K.Alangulam Village, Thiruvengadam Taluk, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to impugned proceedings in O.Mu.(Aa3) 629/2016, dated 19/01/2018 passed by the 2^nd respondent herein and quash the same and consequently to direct the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents herein to issue

¶15

_________Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.5215 of 2018

¶18

patta to the petitioner in respect of the lands comprised in S.No.98/10, with extent of East West 33 feet, South North 36 feet situated in K.Alangulam Village, Tiruvengadam Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Subbaraj For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Considering the fact that patta has already been issued in pursuance to the decree of the Civil Court, no further orders are required in this writ petition.

¶22

Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No

¶23

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

22.10.2024

¶25

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes

¶26

gbg

¶27

_________Page 2 of 4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD) No.5215 of 2018

¶30

¶31

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶32

2.The Revenue Tahsildar, Thiruvengadam Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶33

3.The Village Administrative Officer, K.Alangulam Village, Thiruvengadam Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶34

Page 3 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD) No.5215 of 2018

¶37

P.T.ASHA, J.

¶38

gbg

¶39

W.P.(MD) No.5215 of 2018

¶40

22.10.2024

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

_________Page 4 of 4

K.Selvaraj, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Selvaraj, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marimuthu.K.M Vs The District Collector

Nagarajan M Vs The District Collector

Soosai Manickam Vs The District Collector

Chinnasamy Vs The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu

Rajalakshmi Vs The District Revenue Officer

Mohamed Shafi. Mkm Vs The District Collector / Inspector of Panchayats