Chinnadurai .S v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; liberty to reopen if petitioner is not promoted as submitted by Government Advocate.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
Writ petition closed; liberty to reopen if petitioner is not promoted as submitted by Government Advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)No.2938 of 2022
S.Chinnadurai ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
2.The Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development), Collectorate, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
3.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Ottapidaram Panchayat Union, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022
records on the file of the 1st respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.V3/15005/2020 dated 30.11.2021 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to promote him to the post of Deputy Block Development Officer on par with his Batch mates as well as the seniority list of Junior Assistant for the year 2015 issued by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings dated 09.05.2012 and 15.05.2015 respectively within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned proceedings dated 30.11.2021 passed by the 1st respondent and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to promote him to the post of Deputy Block Development Officer on par with his Batch mates as well as the seniority list of Junior Assistant for the year 2015 issued by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings dated 09.05.2012 and 15.05.2015.
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022
Advocate on written instructions submitted that the petitioner's case has already been considered for promotion and the petitioner is likely to be promoted by the month of May in the vacancy which would arise on the retirement of six Deputy Block Development Officer. The said submission is recorded.
petitioner is at liberty to reopen the matter, if he is not promoted in terms of the
the said submissions of the learned Government Advocate. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
23.02.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022
To
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Sml
W.P.(MD).No.3364 of 2022
23.02.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Was the petitioner entitled to promotion to Deputy Block Development Officer on par with his batch mates per the 2015 seniority list?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Chinnadurai
The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi
The Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development), Collectorate, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi
The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Ottapidaram Panchayat Union, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi District
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court