This judgment addresses a writ petition filed for mandatory execution regarding settlement of leave and provident fund. The court recorded the petitioner's submission that the claimed amount was already settled and closed the proceedings without a separate order on costs.
Petition stands closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.(MD).No.1824 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 22.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P.(MD)No.1824 of 2024
A.Arokiasamy
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the earned leave surrender, leave on private affairs and special provident fund as per the sanction orders passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.0559/A1/2017 dated 17.05.2022 and K.Dis.No:559/A1/2022 dated 17.06.2022 with interest at the rate of 18% with all the consequent benefits.
1/4
WP.(MD).No.1824 of 2024
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam For Respondents : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, seeking to direct the respondents to settle the earned leave surrender, leave on private affairs and special provident fund as per the sanction orders passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.0559/A1/2017 dated 17.05.2022 and K.Dis.No: 559/A1/2022 dated 17.06.2022 with interest at the rate of 18% with all the consequent benefits.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the amount of Rs.10,41,112/-, to which the petitioner is entitled has already been settled. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition.
3 .Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and carefully perused the entire materials available on record.
2/4
WP.(MD).No.1824 of 2024
stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
22.02.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Mrn
To
3/4
WP.(MD).No.1824 of 2024
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Mrn
W.P.(MD)No.1824 of 2024
22.02.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to settle leave and provident fund benefits should be disposed of given the submission that the amount was already settled.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Arokiasamy
The Director of School Education, Chennai - 6
The Chief Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram District
The District Treasury Officer, Collectorate Campus, Ramanathapuram District
L. Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
