Disposed

R.a.Ganesan v. The Joint Commissioner

Madras HC20 Dec 2024WP(MD)/31332/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking direction to the temple authorities to consider the petitioner's representation for issue of rent receipt and transfer of a house in his name. The court, without expressing opinion on merits, directed the second respondent to consider the representation after hearing the petitioner within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Second respondent directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 02.09.2024 after hearing him and pass orders within 12 weeks; no costs.

R.a.Ganesan Vs The Joint Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 20.12.2024

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P(MD)No.31332 of 2024

¶6

R.A.Ganesan ... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Dindigul District.

¶9

2.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Kambaraya Perumal Kovil and Kasi Viswanathar Kovil, Cumbum,Theni

¶10

3.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Chennai. .. Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issuje rent receipt by considering the representation given by the Petitioner, dated 02.09.2024 and to transfer the house in the name of the Petitioner and permit to carry out the repair works as and when necessary.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Govt.Pleader

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction, directing the respondents to issuje rent receipt by considering the representation given by the Petitioner, dated 2.9.2024 and to transfer the house in the name of the Petitioner and permit to carry out the repair works as and when necessary.

¶18

2.Mr.P.Subbaraj, learned Special Government Pleader

¶19

takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itsef.

¶20

3 .Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Writ Petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner, dated 02.09.2024, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

2/4

¶23

4.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed

¶24

of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶25

20.12.2024

¶26

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes vsn

¶27

¶28

1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Dindigul District.

¶29

2.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Kambaraya Perumal Kovil and Kasi Viswanathar Kovil, Cumbum,Theni

¶30

3.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Chennai.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/4

¶33

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶34

vsn

¶35

Order made in W.P(MD)No.31332 of 2024

¶36

20.12.2024

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/4

R.a.Ganesan v. The Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.a.Ganesan v. The Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Backiyaraj.G Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Saranya .G Vs The Director

Ananth @ Ananthu Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

N.Mayuran Vs The District Collector

Sangara Lingam Vs v.Kannan

Sumathi Vs The Sub Registrar