Dismissed

Sangara Lingam v. v.Kannan

Madras HC20 Dec 2024REV.APLW(MD)/242/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a Review Application filed to review a prior judgment regarding temple access and performance permissions. The court clarified that customarily permitted non-pooja performances by specific persons remain valid until the final order is passed.

What did the court decide?

Review Application disposed of; no costs awarded; clarification issued regarding performance permissions.

Sangara Lingam Vs v.Kannan — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Rev.Aplc (MD).No.242 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Rev.Aplc (MD)No.242 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.29906 of 2024

¶7

Mr.Sangara Lingham ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.V.Kannan

¶10

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶11

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶12

4.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Thoothukudi District.

¶13

5.The Inspector of Police, Tiruchendur Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶14

6.The Tahsildar, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶15

7.The Village Administrative Officer, Kuthirai Mozhi Village,

¶16

1/5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Rev.Aplc (MD).No.242 of 2024

¶19

Tiruchencur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶20

8.The Chairman of the Trust Board, Arulmigu Karkuvel Ayyanar Temple, Kuthirai Mozhi Village, Theri Kuddiruppu, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶21

9.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Karkuvel Ayyanar Temple, Kuthirai Mozhi Village, Theri Kudiiruppu, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶22

10.Mr.T.Dhas 11.Mr.Senthilkumar 12.Mr.Ramakrishnan 13.Mr.Thillairaj 14.Mr.G.K.Aarumugham 15.Mr.Masanakonaar, 16.Mr.Natrajan 17.Mr.Poodhalingham 18.Mr.Sivan Perumal 19.Mr.Hari Raman

¶23

...Respondents

¶24

Prayer: Review Application filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India and Order 47, Rule-1 r/w Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to review the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.29906 of 2024, dated 11.12.2024 and allow the present Review Application.

¶25

For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For R1 : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar For RR 2,4,6 to 8 : Mr.D.Gandhi Raj Special Government Pleader For R3 & R5 : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/5

¶28

Rev.Aplc (MD).No.242 of 2024

¶29

O R D E R

¶30

This Review application has been filed to review the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.29906 of 2024, dated 11.12.2024.

¶31

Though this Court finds no error apparent on the order passed by this Court, it is clarified that clause 3 of the Peace Committee Resolution dated

¶32

05.12.2024 is clear that till the passing of the final order, the customary performance except pooja can be done by the persons, who are already permitted to do the same for the propitiatory deities.

¶33

Accordingly, the review application is disposed of. No costs.

¶34

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order am

¶35

20.12.2024

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/5

¶38

Rev.Aplc (MD).No.242 of 2024

¶39

¶40

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶41

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶42

3.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Thoothukudi District.

¶43

4.The Inspector of Police, Tiruchendur Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶44

5.The Tahsildar, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶45

6.The Village Administrative Officer, Kuthirai Mozhi Village, Tiruchencur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶46

7.The Chairman of the Trust Board, Arulmigu Karkuvel Ayyanar Temple, Kuthirai Mozhi Village, Theri Kuddiruppu, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/5

¶49

Rev.Aplc (MD).No.242 of 2024

¶50

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶51

¶52

Rev.Application (MD).No.242 of 2024

¶53

20.12.2024

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

5/5

Sangara Lingam v. v.Kannan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangara Lingam v. v.Kannan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Backiyaraj.G Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Saranya .G Vs The Director

Ananth @ Ananthu Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

R.a.Ganesan Vs The Joint Commissioner

N.Mayuran Vs The District Collector

Sumathi Vs The Sub Registrar