The petitioner sought de-freezing of a bank account. The respondent bank submitted the account was already de-frozen with a lien. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P(MD)NO.30165 OF 2024 and W.M.P(MD)No.25381 of 2024
Kamaludeen : Petitioner
.vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to de-freeze the Petitioners bank account NO. 578802010005439 by considering the Petitioner’s mail representation, dated 21.09.2024 and 25.09.2024.
For Petitioner :Mr.K.Navaneetharaja For Respondent-1 :Mr.K.Gnanasekaran For Respondent-2 :Mr.V.Balasubramanian
2
**O R D E R ************
This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to de-freeze the Petitioners bank account NO. 578802010005439 by considering the Petitioner’s mail representation, dated 21.09.2024 and 25.09.2024.
2.Mr.K.Gnanasekaran, learned counsel takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.V.Balasubramanian, learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.The learned counsel for the second respondent referring to the letter dated 13.12.2024, of the second respondent submits that the Petitioner’s subject account has already been de-freezed, by making as lein the disputed amount of Rs.6,500/-, as per order of the Superintendent of Police, Cyber Crime Cell, , Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat, dated 27.11.2024.
4.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the second respondent, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous
3
Petition is closed.
16.12.2024
NSC :Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
vsn
To
4
N.MALA, J.
vsn
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)NO.30165 OF 2024 and W.M.P(MD)No.25381 of 2024
16.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's bank account, frozen by police order, should be directed to be de-frozen.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamaludeen
The Commissioner of Police, Cyber Crime, Tiruchirappalli City
The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, No.534,66, West Bouleward Road, Tiruchirappalli
N.Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
