Disposed

B.Brijesh Kishore v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC22 Nov 2024WP(MD)/25751/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner challenged the non-consideration of his representation regarding illegal construction. The High Court held that non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty and directed respondents to consider the representation and pass orders within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the representation dated 14.10.2024 and pass appropriate orders within three months.

B.Brijesh Kishore Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶7

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024 and WMP(MD) No.21818/2024

¶8

B.Brijesh Kishore ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (Ma.1) Department, Chennai..

¶11

The Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning, Government of Tamilnadu, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107..

¶12

The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning Department, No.108, Thiruvananthapuram Road, Tirunelveli District..

¶13

The District Collector/Chair Person of Monitoring Committee, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil..

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/7

¶16

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶17

The Assistant Director, District Town and Country Planning Office, Collector Office Campus, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil..

¶18

The Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.

¶19

The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.

¶20

The Executive Officer, Kulasekharam Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari District..

¶21

Junior Engineer (Urban), TANGEDCO, Kulasekharam Distribution Circle, Kanyakumari District..

¶22

John Ebenezer, Sub Inspector of Survey, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District, Formerly Working as Deputy Inspector of Survey, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari

¶23

Raja Vinu, S/o.Thangaraj, Manalivilai Puthen Veedu, Cheruppalur and Post, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari District..

¶24

2/7

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶27

Raja Kumar, S/o.Thangaraj, Manalivilai Puthen Veedu, Cheruppalur and Post, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶28

PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 8 herein to demolish the illegal and unauthorized construction namely Apartment building put up by the 11^th respondent herein in Survey No.40/2A1 consisting of 2 cents and 784 sq.links of Aruvikkarai Village, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari District without obtaining valid Building Plan Approval from the 8th Respondent herein on the basis of the Petitioner's representation made before them by RPAD dated 14.10.2024.

¶29

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Rajakumar For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok for R1 to R6 Additional Government Pleader Mr.P.Kottaichamy for R7 Government Advocate (crl. Side) Mr.S.Deenadayalan for R9

¶30

ORDER

¶31

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.)

¶32

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to direct the respondents 2 to 8 herein to demolish the illegal and unauthorized

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/7

¶35

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶36

construction namely apartment building put up by the 11^th respondent herein in Survey No.40/2A1 consisting of 2 cents and 784 sq. links of Aruvikkarai Village, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari District without obtaining valid building plan approval from the 8^th respondent herein on the basis of the Petitioner's representation made before them by RPAD dated 14.10.2024.

¶37

The petitioner herein had given a representation to the respondents 2 to 8 on 14.10.2024 to demolish the illegal construction made by the 11^th respondent. Since the said representation was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶38

It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to Statutory Authorities, there is a duty cast upon them to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution

¶39

4/7

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶42

of the India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

¶43

In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondents 1 to 8 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and the respondent No.11 herein, as well as all other persons, who may be interested in the subject property , within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter

¶44

and that it is open to the concerned respondents to consider the same on its own merits.

¶45

With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶46

No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶47

[M.S.R.,J] [A.D.M.C.,J] 22.11.2024

¶48

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR

¶49

5/7

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶52

¶53

The Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (Ma.1) Department, Chennai..

¶54

The Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning, Government of Tamilnadu, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107..

¶55

The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning Department, No.108, Thiruvananthapuram Road, Tirunelveli District..

¶56

The District Collector/Chair Person of Monitoring Committee, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil..

¶57

The Assistant Director, District Town and Country Planning Office, Collector Office Campus, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil..

¶58

The Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.

¶59

The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District @ Nagercoil.

¶60

The Executive Officer, Kulasekharam Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari District..

¶61

6/7

¶62

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶63

WP(MD). No.25751 of 2024

¶64

M.S. RAMESH, J. AND A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

¶65

¶66

ORDER IN WP(MD) No. 25751 of 2024

¶67

Date : 22/11/2024

¶68

7/7

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B.Brijesh Kishore v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Brijesh Kishore v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Co-operative Sub-Registrar Vs Murugeshwari.K

R.Thayalan Vs The District Collector

M/s. Lakshmi Traders Vs The Designated Officer (Thanjavur District)

Tvl.Sithara Wires Vs The State Tax Officer

V.Vairamuthu Vs B.Selvam

Kavitha Vs The Authorized Officer