Dismissed

R.Thayalan v. The District Collector

Madras HC21 Nov 2024WP(MD)/27870/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking cancellation of forged community certificates, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that reconsideration was impermissible when the petitioners had already failed to substantiate their case in three prior writ petitions dismissed by coordinate benches.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not maintainable due to failure to substantiate claim in prior dismissed petitions.

R.Thayalan Vs The District Collector — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

¶6

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

R.Thayalan

... Petitioner

The District Collector, District Collectorate, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore - 641018..

¶11

The District Collector, District Collectorate, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur..

¶12

The Tahsildar, South Taluk Office, Coimbatore - 641018..

¶13

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpettai, Tiruppur District..

¶14

The Tahsildar, Perur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

¶18

The Village Administrative Officer, Kuniyamuthur Village, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore - 641008..

¶19

C.K.Krishnasamy (C.K as Per, Sale Deed No. 1911/1987), No. 399, Pothigai Illam, Thirumoorthy Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶20

K.Chandrika, D/o. C.K.Krishnasamy, No. 399, Pothigai Illam, Thirumoorthy Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶21

K.Sangeetha, D/o. C.K.Krishnasamy, No. 399, Pothigai Illam, Thirumoorthy Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶22

K.Shyam, S/o. C.K.Krishnasamy, No. 399, Pothigai Illam, Thirumoorthy Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶23

Sankarguru, C/o. C.K.Krishnasamy, IT Wing Employee, No. 399, Pothigai Illam, Thirumoorthy Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶24

2/6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

¶27

Kaavia Tamilan, C/o. C.K.Krishnasamy, IT Wing Employee, No. 399, Pothigai Illam, Thirumoorthy Nagar, Kuniyamuthur, Coimbatore District – 641008. ... Respondents

¶28

PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to take appropriate legal action against the respondents 7,10,11 and to cancel the forged community certificates obtained by the respondents 7,9,10 by showing them as Devendra Kula Velalar within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶29

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thayalan Party-in-Person

¶30

For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar for R1 to R3, R5 and R6 Government Pleader

¶31

Mr.P.Kottaichamy for R4 Government Advocate (Crl. side)

¶32

ORDER

¶33

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.)

¶34

The prayer in the writ petition for cancellation of the community certificate of one Dr.K.Krishnasamy, who is here shown as

¶35

3/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

¶38

C.K.Krishnasamy, was already considered by this Court in a writ petition in WP(MD) No.14915/2014 and vide order dated 12.09.2014, the writ petition was dismissed. Like wise, two other writ petitions were also filed for the same relief in WP No.28122 of 2015, which was dismissed on 01.10.2015 and WP No.18403 of 2017 that came to be dismissed on 24.04.2019. Now, the petitioner herein would submit that he has some concrete evidence to substantiate his claim made in the writ petition.

¶39

We are afraid, such reconsideration is impermissible in law, when this Court had already considered the prayer sought for and the petitioners therein had failed to substantiate their case before the coordinate benches. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not maintainable. No costs.

¶40

[M.S.R.,J] [A.D.M.C.,J] 21.11.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

¶41

¶42

4/6

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

¶45

¶46

The District Collector, District Collectorate, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore - 641018..

¶47

The District Collector, District Collectorate, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur..

¶48

The Tahsildar, South Taluk Office, Coimbatore - 641018..

¶49

The Deputy Superintendent Of, Police, Udumalpettai, Tiruppur District..

¶50

The Tahsildar, Perur, Coimbatore District - 641008..

¶51

The Village Administrative Officer, Kuniyamuthur Village, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore - 641008..

¶52

5/6

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

WP(MD). No.27870 of 2024

¶55

M.S. RAMESH, J. AND A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

¶56

¶57

ORDER IN WP(MD) No. 27870 of 2024

¶58

Date : 21/11/2024

¶59

6/6

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Thayalan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Thayalan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Majilisul Bhuhari Sheriff Waqf Vs M.Abdul Rahman

S.Paulraj(Died)(Substitutued by)I.Mary, Vs the District Educational Officer

Moosa Naina Vs The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board

The Co-operative Sub-Registrar Vs Murugeshwari.K

M/s. Lakshmi Traders Vs The Designated Officer (Thanjavur District)

The State of Tamil Nadu, Vs K Jeyanthi