Disposed

M/s. Aim Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals)

Madras HC18 Oct 2024WP(MD)/24175/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the rejection of IGST refund was disposed of by directing the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within four weeks, avoiding merits examination despite foreign precedent.

What did the court decide?

Directed Appellate Authority to dispose of pending appeal within four weeks; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

M/s. Aim Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of… — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD).No.20444 of 2024

¶8

M/s.AIM Worldwide Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Proprietor.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Coimbatore @ Tiruchirappalli, No.1, Williams Road, Cantonment,

¶12

Tiruchirappalli.

¶13

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, New Harbour Estate, Tuticorin – 628 004. ...Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in C.No.VIII/20/216/2018-IGST dated 17.01.2020 and quash the same as illegal and further direct the second respondent to refund the IGST paid by the petitioner to the tune of

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/5

¶17

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024

¶18

Rs.7,19,365/- for the exports made during July 2017 to August 2017 with accrued interest at 18% from the date on which a request for refund in the form of Shipping Bills is made till the date of payment within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian For Respondents : Mr.R.Gowrishankar Senior Standing Counsel

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the second respondent dated 17.01.2020, whereby, the petitioner's request for refund of IGST was rejected. Against the above proceedings, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the first respondent in Appeal No.C24/07/2022TTN(CUS) dated 04.02.2022 and the same is stated to be pending for more than two years.

¶22

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in respect of identical transactions, the petitioner's claim for refund has already been granted by the Gujarat High Court in Civil Application No.15648/2020 vide order dated 22.12.2021. It was thus submitted that the rejection of the claim of IGST refund is clearly unsustainable.

¶23

2/5

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024

¶26

I do not propose to examine the merits of the above contention, inasmuch as the petitioner has already availed the statutory remedy by way of appeal. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the first respondent/Appellate Authority shall be directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 04.02.2022 within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is open to the petitioner to place reliance on the decision of the Gujarat High Court, which according to him, covers the entire issue. The Appellate Authority shall examine all the contentions raised by the petitioner and pass a speaking order in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶27

Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶28

18.10.2024

¶29

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Lm

¶30

3/5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024

¶33

¶34

1.The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Coimbatore @ Tiruchirappalli, No.1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli.

¶35

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, New Harbour Estate, Tuticorin – 628 004.

¶36

4/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024

¶39

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

¶40

¶41

W.P.(MD).No.24175 of 2024

¶42

18.10.2024

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

5/5

M/s. Aim Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Aim Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sivakumar, Proprietor Vs The Additional Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Mohammed Muthalip. a Vs The Chief Executive Officer

Kattu Bava Sahib Pallivasal @ Peer Mohammed Sahib Pallivasal Vs The Chief Executive Officer

M/s. Sri Sadurmugan Traders Vs The Deputy Commissioner (St)

Noorbasha Vs The Chief Executive Officer

M/s. Sagar Brush Industries Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)