Dismissed

Noorbasha v. The Chief Executive Officer

Madras HC18 Oct 2024WP(MD)/21864/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed to stop trustee elections in Al-Jamaathul Hidaya Charitable Trust was dismissed after the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek remedy before a Division Bench.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek remedy before Division Bench in connected W.A.(MD) No.1291 of 2023.

Noorbasha Vs The Chief Executive Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

Noorbasha

Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Wakf Board, Wakf House No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar,

¶11

Chennai - 600 001.

¶12

2.The Wakf Superintendent, Wakf Superintendent Office, No.8/124, Quide Millath Road, Palakarai,

¶13

Trichy – 620 008.

¶14

3.S.Thajudeen

¶15

4.J.Haneefa

¶16

5.K.Syed Ibrahim

¶17

6.V.M.Mohammed Ansar

¶18

7.P.K.Zakir Hussain

¶19

8.P.K.Khayyum Ummer

¶20

Page 1 of 5

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

¶23

9.N.Abdul Kereem 10.M.Kamarudeen 11.S.M.Kaleelur Rahman 12.S.Samsudeen 13.A.Amanullah 14.S.Syed Anwar 15.J.Mohamed Iqbal 16.B.Mohamed Shafi 17.I.Yasar Arafath ... Respondents

¶24

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to take necessary steps to stop the conduct of trustee election scheduled to be held on 15.09.2024 in Al-Jamaathul Hidaya Charitable Trust, situated at No.25 Dhanarathinam Nagar Extension, Tanjore Road, Trichy, in virtue of the order passed by this Honble Court in WP (MD) No.29102 of 2022, dated 19.04.2023, by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 08.09.2024.

¶25

Page 2 of 5

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

¶28

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Yasmin Begum

¶29

For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan, Standing Counsel.

¶30

For Respondents 3,5,11 & 12 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff

¶31

For Respondents 4, 6 to 9, 10 & 13 to 17 : No appearance

¶32

ORDER

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to seek the remedy before the Division Bench in W.A.(MD) No.1291 of 2023. She has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.

¶34

Permission is granted and this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as sought for. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.P.(MD) No.18523 of 2024 is closed.

¶35

18.10.2024

¶36

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶37

dixit

¶38

_____________ Page 3 of 5_

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

¶41

To:

¶42

1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Wakf Board, Wakf House No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai - 600 001.

¶43

2.The Wakf Superintendent, Wakf Superintendent Office, No.8/124, Quide Millath Road, Palakarai,

¶44

Trichy – 620 008.

¶45

Page 4 of 5

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

¶48

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

¶49

dixit

¶50

W.P.(MD) No.21864 of 2024

¶51

18.10.2024

¶52

Page 5 of 5

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Noorbasha v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Noorbasha v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sivakumar, Proprietor Vs The Additional Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Mohammed Muthalip. a Vs The Chief Executive Officer

Kattu Bava Sahib Pallivasal @ Peer Mohammed Sahib Pallivasal Vs The Chief Executive Officer

M/s. Sri Sadurmugan Traders Vs The Deputy Commissioner (St)

M/s. Aim Worldwide Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals)

M/s. Sagar Brush Industries Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)