Arul Jothi.M v. The District Educational Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged suspension order. Respondents reported suspension revoked and petitioner reinstated. Court closed the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.23090 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)No.23090 of 2022 and WMP(MD)No.17186 of 2022
M.Arul Jothi
... Petitioner
Vs
- 1.The District Educational Officer, District Educational Office, Palani Road, Dindigul – 624 001.
- 2.The Block Educational Officer, Natham Block Educational Office, Natham, Dindigul District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the suspension order passed by the 1st respondent in proceedings RC.No.3631/B4/2022, dated 19.09.2022 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service and grant the service and monetary benefits within the time limit to be fixed by this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Arul Jothi
- respondent
The District Educational Officer, District Educational Office, Palani Road, Dindigul
- respondent
The Block Educational Officer, Natham Block Educational Office, Natham, Dindigul District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court