The court recorded the petitioner's submission that the writ petitions challenging transfer counseling orders had become infructuous and dismissed the petitions accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.11633,11634,11637, 11638, 11641 & 11642 of 2018
WP(MD) No.12751 of 2018:-
P.Manickavasagam ... Petitioner
Vs
1/7
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
WP(MD) No.12753 of 2018:-
O.Selvam ... Petitioner
Vs
2/7
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
6.The District Educational Officer, O/o. the District Education Office, Usilampatti, Madurai District. ...Respondents
WP(MD) No.12755 of 2018:-
K.Venkatesan ... Petitioner
Vs
3/7
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions fil ed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.35476/W1//E1/2018 dated Nil.06.2018 (Published in the internet on 11.06.2018) and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.H.Mohemmed Imran For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate (In all WPs)
C O M M O N O R D E R
Challenging the order passed by the Joint Director of
School Education (Higher Secondary), Chennai, directing the Deputy Inspector of Schools, who have completed three years in the same cadre have to apply for transfer counseling, the petitioners hav filed this writ petition in the year 2018.
2.Today(11.11.2024), when these writ petitions are taken
up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that these writ petitions have become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
4/7
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
11.11.2024
NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes vrn
5/7
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
To
6/7
W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
Common Order made in W.P(MD)Nos.12751, 12753 & 12755 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.11633,11634,11637, 11638, 11641 & 11642 of 2018
11.11.2024
7/7
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions have become infructuous?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Manickavasagam
O.Selvam
K.Venkatesan
State of Tamilnadu
The Director of School Education
The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel)
B.Pugaleldhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
