Disposed

Ramasamy v. The Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC26 Sept 2024WP(MD)/22946/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This interim order disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus for the registration of a society. The court directed the petitioner to file an online application with necessary fees, upon which the Registrar must process and register the society within one month.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit online application with fees; Respondent to register society within one month of receipt.

Ramasamy Vs The Inspector General of Registration — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.22946 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 26.09.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.22946 of 2024

Ramasamy

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Patinapakkam, Chennai-625 020.

¶11

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli Division,Tirunelveli.

¶12

3.The Registrar of Societies / District Registrar, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3^rd respondent to register the petitioner's society namely, M.Kumarasakkanapuram Kalvi Membattu Sangam and to issue registration certificate for the same within a time that may be fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Navaneetharaja For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P(MD)No.22946 of 2024

¶18

ORDER

¶19

By consent of both parties this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶20

2.According to the petitioner, his village people formed an association in the name of M/s.M.Kumarasakkanapuram Kalvi Membattu Sangam and submitted an application to register the same before the 3^rd respondent on 25.07.2024. Since the same is pending without any progress, they made a representation dated 28.08.2024 to the respondents, requesting to complete the registration process and issue registration certificate. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

¶21

3.Mr.C.Satheesh, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has not applied for registration in the online portal with relevant fees and therefore, the same could not be processed. He assures that if the petitioner submits application through online with necessary fees, the same would be processed and registered.

¶22

4.In view of the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate for the respondents, the petitioner is directed to submit an application

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

W.P(MD)No.22946 of 2024

¶26

in the online portal with necessary fees. On receipt of the same, the 3^rd respondent is directed to consider the same and pass necessary orders within a period of one month from the date of submitting the application.

¶27

5.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶28

costs.

¶29

26.09.2024

¶30

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶31

Yuva

¶32

¶33

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Patinapakkam, Chennai-625 020.

¶34

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli Division,Tirunelveli.

¶35

3.The Registrar of Societies / District Registrar, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

W.P(MD)No.22946 of 2024

¶39

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J

¶40

Yuva

¶41

W.P(MD)No.22946 of 2024

¶42

26.09.2024

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Ramasamy v. The Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramasamy v. The Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basheer Mydeen Vs The Sub-Registrar (Registration)

Syed Ahamed Ali.M Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Canara Bank Vs The Sub Registrar

R.Jayamurugan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

M.D.Abish Rockey Vs The Vice Chancellor

S.Keerthi Vs The Deen (Agriculture)