Disposed

Thangamani v. The District Superintendent of Police

Madras HC26 Sept 2024WP(MD)/22930/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for direction to consider representation and take appropriate action on complaint. Court noted representation was pending and directed the second respondent to issue notice, conduct enquiry, and pass orders within two weeks. Petition disposed of with this direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to conduct enquiry and pass orders within two weeks.

Thangamani Vs The District Superintendent of Police — Madras HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P(MD)No.22930 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 26.09.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.22930 of 2024

¶7

Thangamani : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District. : Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 29.08.2024 and consequently, directing the second respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation within time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶13

for R1 and R2.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD)No.22930 of 2024

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking orders to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 29.08.2024 and consequently, directing the second respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation within time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶19

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would submit that the representation given by the petitioner is pending before the second respondent.

¶20

Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the second respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioner as well as the respondent in the petitioner's complaint and conduct enquiry and pass orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P(MD)No.22930 of 2024

¶23

With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

No costs.

¶25

26.09.2024 NCC : Yes/ No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das

¶26

¶27

1.The District Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶28

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶29

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P(MD)No.22930 of 2024

¶33

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.

¶34

das

¶35

Order made in W.P(MD)No.22930 of 2024

¶36

26.09.2024

¶37

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Thangamani v. The District Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thangamani v. The District Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Subramanian Vs The Superintendent of Police

C.Mohan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Theyvendran Vs The Superintendent of Police

Subbaiah @ Arivu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

K.Murugan Vs M.Senthil Kumar

Lurthu Seviyar @ Lurthu Xavier Vs The State of Tamilnadu