Petitioner sought mandamus directing police protection to construct a partition wall on his property pursuant to a decree in second appeal. The court directed the Inspector of Police to issue notice to petitioner and private respondents, conduct an enquiry and take a decision within ten days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.22768 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.09.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
W.P.(MD)No.22768 of 2024
C.Mohan
...Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to construct a partition wall on the northern side of his property comprised in Survey No.219/1 situated at Nerkuppai Village, Nochiyam Post, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District pursuant to the Judgment and decree passed by this Court in S.A.(MD).No.223 of 2011 dated 27.06.2011.
1/4
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Leninkumar
W.P(MD)No.22768 of 2024
For R1 & R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The Writ Petition has been filed seeking orders to direct the second
respondent to provide adequate police protection to the writ petitioner to construct a partition wall on the northern side of his property comprised in Survey No.219/1 situated at Nerkuppai Village, Nochiyam Post, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District pursuant to the judgment and decree passed by this Court in S.A.(MD).No.223 of 2011 dated 27.06.2011.
submit that the writ petitioner and others have filed a suit claiming permanent injunction and mandatory injunction and the matter went upto the High Court in second appeal and the second appeal was partly
2/4
W.P(MD)No.22768 of 2024
allowed granting permanent injunction but dismissing the appeal with regard to mandatory injunction. He would further submit that the writ petitioner and others have already filed a petition seeking execution. He would further submit that the writ petitioner has given a representation seeking police protection for constructing partition wall in pursuance of the decree obtained by him.
respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the writ petitioner's representation is pending before the second respondent.
issue notice to the writ petitioner as well as to the private respondents and conduct enquiry and take a decision within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
25.09.2024
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm
3/4
W.P(MD)No.22768 of 2024
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
csm
To
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.22768 of 2024
Dated : 25.09.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police protection should be directed for constructing a partition wall pursuant to a decree in S.A.(MD)No.223 of 2011?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Mohan
The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District
The Inspector of Police, Kollidam Police Station, Trichy District
Manoharan
Sathishkumar
K.Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
