appointed as President of Pallivasal, against whom the petitioner's mother had instituted a suit in O.S.No.839 of 1988, in which the said two individuals had filed a memo to submit a decree and thereafter the property of the Wakf is in possession of the petitioner, but however the sixth respondent herein was appointed as Mutawalli on 31.03.2022. On being appointed as Mutawalli, the 6th respondent had acted against the interest of the Wakf, had removed the trees standing in the Wakf properties. Hence, the petitioner's brother who was line in succession, challenged the order of appointment of the sixth respondent and also made a representation to take action against the 6th respondent. As no action was initiated, the petitioner’s brother had moved this Court in a writ petition in W.P. (MD) No.15832 of 2019 in which direction was issued to consider the representation of his brother. Thereafter, an enquiry had been conducted by the second respondent and he had forwarded a report to the first respondent to pass final orders. However, the same is still pending. The said report also indicates that the petitioner is also entitled to be appointed as Mutawalli, as he stands in the line of succession and his brother had also passed away.
