Durairaj, v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition challenging proceedings of the Commissioner. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without observation of costs.
What did the court decide?
writ petition dismissed as withdrawn
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) No.11630 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD) No.11630 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8967 of 2017
Durairaj
... Petitioner
/vs./
1.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
2.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Muthumariamman Temple, Meenakshipuram, Karaikudi. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 07.06.2017 in Mu.Tha.Manu. 24431/2017/H1 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct enquiry by issuing notice to
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Durairaj
- respondent
Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality
- respondent
Executive Officer, Arulmighu Muthumariamman Temple
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court