Disposed

Balakrishnan v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC2 Sept 2024WP(MD)/20768/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus against police officials to take action on alleged forged property documents involving private respondents. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the complaint was forwarded and pending. The court directed the Inspector of Police to issue written summons to all parties and complete the enquiry within two we

What did the court decide?

Direction to Inspector of Police to issue written summons and conclude enquiry within two weeks.

Balakrishnan Vs The Superintendent of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.20768 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02.09.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.20768 of 2024

Balakrishnan

: Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶12

3.Ramasamy

¶13

4.Lakshmanan

¶14

5.Kandasamy

¶15

6.R.Dhanalakshmi

¶16

7.A.Anbalagan

¶17

8.K.Vairamani

¶18

9.A.Kuttimani

¶19

10.V.Rengasamy

¶20

11.A.Palanisamy : Respondents

¶21

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the

¶22

1/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P(MD)No.20768 of 2024

¶25

respondents 1 and 2 herein to take action against the respondents 3 to 11 herein for creating forged documents with regard to the property in S.Nos.456/1A1, 456/1A2, 456/1A3, 73/2B, 75/2A, 14/1, 14/2, 14/3, 15/1, 15/2 and 15/3 totally to an extent of 13 acres situated at karungulam Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District and the property in S.Nos.143/1, 152/2, 176/2A, 176/4A, 303 and 146/7 totally 20 acres situated at Kalaiyapatti Village, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District based on the petitioner's representation, dated 27.03.2024.

¶26

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathisankar,

¶27

For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for R1 & R2.

¶28

O R D E R

¶29

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to take action against the respondents 3 to 11 herein for creating forged documents with regard to the property in S.Nos.456/1A1, 456/1A2, 456/1A3, 73/2B, 75/2A, 14/1, 14/2, 14/3, 15/1, 15/2 and 15/3 totally to an extent of 13 acres situated at karungulam Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District and the property in S.Nos.143/1, 152/2, 176/2A, 176/4A, 303 and 146/7 totally 20 acres situated at Kalaiyapatti Village, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District based on the petitioner's representation, dated 27.03.2024.

¶30

2/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P(MD)No.20768 of 2024

¶33

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would submit that the complaint given before the first respondent was forwarded to the Inspector of Police, Gujiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul and the same is pending for enquiry.

¶34

Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the Inspector of Police, Gujiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul, is directed to issue written summons to the petitioner and to the private respondents for causing their appearance before him for enquiry and there is no question of orally summoning the parties to the police station and conclude the enquiry within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶35

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶36

No costs.

¶37

02.09.2024

¶38

NCC : Yes/ No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das

¶39

3/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P(MD)No.20768 of 2024

¶42

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J

¶43

das

¶44

¶45

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶46

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶47

3.The Inspector of Police, Gujiliamparai Police Station, Dindigul.

¶48

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶49

Order made in W.P(MD)No.20768 of 2024

¶50

02.09.2024

¶51

4/4

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Balakrishnan v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balakrishnan v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunasekaran Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Rajagopalan Vs The Superintendent of Police

Arumugam. R Vs The Superintendent of Police

P.Venkatesan Vs The Inspector of Police

Dhanush @ Thanush Vs The Inspector of Police

Kishorkumar. R Vs The Superintendent of Police