S.P.Ramesh, v. the Special Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought pension after rejection. Counsel submitted pension was granted from 2018. Court closed the petition with no costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed with no costs after pension was granted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.20717 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)No.20717 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.16988 of 2017
S.P.Ramesh
... Petitioner
/Vs./
The Special Thasildar, Social Welfare Scheme, Andipatti, Theni District.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for all records relating to the order in Na.Ka.No.6148/2017/E1 dated 02.08.2017 of the respondent and quash the same and direct the respondent to sanction and grant old age pension under the Indira Gandhi National Old aged Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS) on the basis of the petitioner's application dated 22.06.2017
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to old age pension under IGNIOAPS despite initial rejection?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.P.Ramesh
- respondent
The Special Thasildar, Social Welfare Scheme, Andipatti, Theni District
Coram
B.Pugale ndhi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court