Disposed

Desingurajan.P v. the Managing Director

Madras HC4 Jun 2024WP(MD)/19067/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a mandatory direction for the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to settle the difference in retiral benefits by applying a 100% dearness allowance as per G.O.Ms.No.96, with interest. The court directed the Managing Director to dispose of the pending representation on merits within eight weeks and disposed of the petition with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2021 on merits within eight weeks of the order's receipt.

Desingurajan.P Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.19067 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 04.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.19067 of 2021

P.Desingurajan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Limited,

¶11

27, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam – 612 001.

¶12

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Limited, Kumbakonam Region, Kumbakonam – 612 001. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the difference of amount of retiral benefits of the petitioner taking into account the dearness allowance as 100% instead of 90% from 01.04.2014 in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.96, Finance (Allowances) Department dated 03.04.2014 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from 01.01.2014 to till the date of actual payment by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2021.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabakaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Balasubramanian Standing Counsel

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.19067 of 2021

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to settle the difference of amount of retiral benefits of the petitioner taking into account the dearness allowance as 100% instead of 90% from 01.04.2014 in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.96, Finance (Allowances) Department dated 03.04.2014 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from 01.01.2014 to till the date of actual payment by considering the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2021.

¶20

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given representation dated 10.06.2021 to the respondents, requesting them to settle the difference amount in retiral benefits to the petitioner, as per G.O.(Ms).No.96, Finance (Allowances) Department, dated 03.04.2014, together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum payable from 01.01.2014 to till the date of actual payment. But, the respondents have not passed any order till date. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing this Writ Petition.

¶21

3.Mr.P.Balasubramanian, learned Standing counsel takes notice for the respondents and submitted that the representations of the petitioner, dated 10.06.2021, will be considered within a period of eight weeks time.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/4

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.19067 of 2021

¶25

4.Considering the above said submissions, this Court directs the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.06.2021, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

5.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶27

costs.

¶28

04.06.2024

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Mrn

¶30

¶31

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Limited, 27, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam – 612 001.

¶32

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam Limited, Kumbakonam Region, Kumbakonam – 612 001.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.19067 of 2021

¶36

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶37

Mrn

¶38

W.P.(MD)No.19067 of 2021

¶39

04.06.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Desingurajan.P v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Desingurajan.P v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Revinraj Vs The Director of Town Panchayat

P.Subramaniam M/a Vs Idol Sri Arulmigukalyana Pasupatheeswaraswamy

Murugan.K Vs the Commissioner

Sundaralingam P Vs the Principal Account General (a and E)

Jothibasu.P Vs the Managing Director

Valli.M Vs the Commissioner