Disposed

Sathish Kumar. M v. The Managing Director

Madras HC21 Feb 2024WP(MD)/3989/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to the transport corporation to consider his long-pending application for compassionate appointment following his father's death in a duty accident. Court held the representation had to be decided on merits and directed appointment on compassionate ground within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to appoint petitioner on compassionate ground in a suitable post within four weeks; no order as to costs.

Sathish Kumar. M Vs The Managing Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 21.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

M.Sathish Kumar

... Petitioner

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., TNSTC Head Office, No. 27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's application, seeking compassionate appointment to any post preferably an office post in the respondent corporation, by considering the petitioner's educational qualification, within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijaynivas For Respondent : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/5

¶16

W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's application, seeking compassionate appointment to any post preferably an office post in the respondent corporation, by considering the petitioner's educational qualification, within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶19

2 .By consent of both parties, considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶20

3.Heard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. Perused the materials on record.

¶21

4.The petitioner's father was joined as Driver in the respondent Corporation in the year 1996. On 14.07.2008, while he was in duty he met with an accident and he died on the spot. The petitioner has completed Mechanical Engineering. Therefore, he made an application on 29.10.2009

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/5

¶24

W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

¶25

seeking appointment on compassionate grounds. However, the same was not acted upon for more than 15 years. Therefore, he gave a detailed representation on 28.08.2023 to the respondent seeking appointment on compassionate ground. Since the same was not considered, this writ petition came to be filed.

¶26

It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondent to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, nonconsideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct the respondent to consider the same within a stipulated time.

¶27

6.This Court is of the considered view that whenever application seeking appointment on compassionate grounds is made by the legal heirs of the deceased employee, the respondent should act with utmost urgency and pass appropriate orders. Since the petitioner has filed application within a period of three years from the date of his father's death, he is entitled to get appointment

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

3/5

¶30

W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

¶31

on compassionate grounds as per G.O.Ms.No.18, Labour and Employment Department, dated 23.01.2020. However, in this case the petitioner is waiting endlessly for more than a period 13 years. Therefore, this Court direct the respondent to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground in a suitable post within a period of four (4) weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶32

7.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶33

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

21.02.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PNM

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

4/5

¶37

W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

¶38

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶39

PNM

¶40

ORDER IN W.P.(MD).No.3989 of 2024

¶41

21.02.2024

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

5/5

Sathish Kumar. M v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathish Kumar. M v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Sree Valli Vs The Director of School Education

A.Vanaja Vs The District Collector

Mayalagu.K Vs The District Collector

Soundararajan.a Vs The Controlling Authority/Deputy Commissioner of Labour

Karthick.K Vs The Director

Astalakshmi. S Vs The District Collector