Dismissed

J.Mohammed Khan v. Manonmaniam Sundaranar

Madras HC14 Oct 2024WP(MD)/17756/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging notifications regarding backlog vacancies and seeking directions to fill them was closed because the respondent stood counsel submitted via written instructions that the notifications had not been acted upon and no post was filled, leaving nothing for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Penultimate notification of these proceedings closed; no costs.

J.Mohammed Khan Vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.17756 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.17756 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15647 & 15648 of 2018

J.Mohammed Khan

... Petitioner

/Vs./

1.Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Rep. by the Registrar, Abishekapatti,

¶11

Tirunelveli 627 012.

¶12

2.The Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education,

¶13

New Delhi.

¶14

3.The Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002.

¶15

4.The Secretary, Higher Education Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort.St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

PRAYERRAYER

¶20

W.P.(MD)No.17756 of 2018

¶21

PRAYERRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in Advertisements issued by the 1 st Respondent published on 08.07.2018 Corrigendum I dated 17.07.2018 and Corrigendum II un-dated, quash the same and consequently direct the 1 st Respondent to issue the advertisement in conformity with the Reservation Roster as per G.O.Ms.No.55, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) dated 08.04.2010 and fill the backlog vacancies for BC(M).

¶22

For Petitioner : Ms.D.Geetha for M/s.R.Diwakaran For Respondents : Ms.Jesima Yasmin (R1) for M/s.Ajmal Associates Mr.T.Amjad Khan (R4) Government Advocate Tapal Due (R2) No appearance (R3)

¶23

ORDER

¶24

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent University submits that she has received written instructions from the respondent University stating that

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.17756 of 2018

¶28

the impugned notification dated 08.07.2018, Corrigendum I, dated 17.07.2018 and Corrigendum II, un-dated have not been acted upon and no post has been filled up by the respondent University, pursuant to the impugned notifications.

¶29

2. In view of the same, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition, in view of the fact that the petitioner in this writ petition has challenged only the aforesaid impugned notifications. After recording the written instructions dated 10.10.2024 received by the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent University that the impugned notifications have not been acted upon, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶30

14.10.2024 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No sm

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.17756 of 2018

¶34

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶35

¶36

TO :-

¶37

1.The Secretary, Higher Education Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort.St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶38

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.17756 of 2018

¶39

Dated: 14.10.2024

¶40

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

J.Mohammed Khan v. Manonmaniam Sundaranar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Mohammed Khan v. Manonmaniam Sundaranar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J. Moovendhan Vs the Director

S.Ragunathan, Vs the Superintending Engineer

P.Hemalatha Vs the Director of Elementary

M.Sundarapandian Vs the Secretary to Govt, of

T.R.Valsakumari, W/O.Mohandass Vs the Principal Secretary

A.L.Manimegalai, Vs the Director of Medical