Allowed

Earivayal Village Panchayat v. The Assistant Engineer

Madras HC30 Jul 2024WP(MD)/17603/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a writ petition filed by a Village Panchayat seeking to quash a communication from the Assistant Engineer forbidding road maintenance. The Court held that since the road vested in the Panchayat under Section 125 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, the Respondent could not interfere, though the Panchayat must ensure water storage capacity is not affe

What did the court decide?

The impugned communication forbidding the Petitioner from carrying out road maintenance without prior permission from the Respondent is set aside.

Earivayal Village Panchayat Vs The Assistant Engineer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.17603 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 30.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.17603 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)No.15122 of 2024

¶7

Earivayal Village Panchayat, Represented by its President, M.Kannagi, Kalayar Kovil Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Assistant Engineer, Water Resource Department, Saruganiyaru Basin Division, Kalayar Kovil, Sivagangai District. .. Respondent

¶11

Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in No. KO/2024 AE/KAL.KOV Dated 06.05.2024 passed by the respondent and quash the same.

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

_________Page 1 of 4

¶14

W.P.(MD) No.17603 of 2024

¶15

For Petitioner	:	Mr.A.Arun swaminathan
For Respondent	:	Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh
on 30/07/2024		Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent	:	Mr.K.Balasubramanian
on 21/08/2024		Special Government Pleader

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Heard both sides.

¶18

2.The petitioner is a Village Panchayat. The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication issued by the respondent forbearing the petitioner from carrying out any road maintenance works without getting prior permission from the Water Resources Department. My attention is drawn to the relevant entry made in the A- Register. It is seen therefrom that Survey No.170/10 has been mentioned as “cart track”. In the FMB in respect of Survey No.43 of Sakkur Village existence of a cart track is reflected. The jurisdictional Village Administrative Officer has also issued certificate to that effect. Section 125 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 states that all public roads in any village other than the road classified as Highways or Major District Roads or Panchayat Union Roads shall vest in the village panchayat.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

_________Page 2 of 4

¶21

W.P.(MD) No.17603 of 2024

¶22

Once it is seen that the road vests in the local body, it may not be open to the respondent herein to interfere with the right of the local body to carry out any maintenance work in connection with the same. The impugned communication is set aside.

¶23

(*)2(a)The learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the local body should not be allowed to reduce the height of the bund or do anything that may affect the storage capacity of the kanmoi. This submission is beyond cavil. The local body can very well carry on their road works. But then, while doing so, they should ensure that the height of the bund is not reduced and storage capacity of the kanmoi is not affected.”

¶24

3.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar (AE (*)Revised as per order of this Court dated 21/08/2024 made in WP(MD)No. 17603 of 2024 // True Copy // / /2024 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

_________Page 3 of 4

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.17603 of 2024

¶28

MGA

¶29

¶30

The Assistant Engineer, Water Resource Department, Saruganiyaru Basin Division, Kalayar Kovil, Sivagangai District.

¶31

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-39345[F] dated 31/07/2024 )

¶32

W.P(MD)No.17603 of 2024

¶33

30.07.2024

¶34

MGJ(21.08.2024) 4 P 3C

¶35

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

Page 4 of 4

Earivayal Village Panchayat v. The Assistant Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Earivayal Village Panchayat v. The Assistant Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manju Vs The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Irdai)

Parvathi Devi .K Vs The Special District Revenue Officer

Jeyalakshmi J Vs The Commissioner of Police

S.Fathima Beevi Vs The Commissioner of Corporation

G.Pandi Vs The District Collector

Kshatriya Hindu Nadar Palligal Abivurthi Sangam, Perunazhi Vs The Superintendent of Police