Dismissed

Parvathi Devi .K v. The Special District Revenue Officer

Madras HC29 Jul 2024WP(MD)/5847/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct Revenue officers to consider a representation regarding compensation for acquired land. The court observed the issue was amicably resolved via a compromise and dismissed the petition on withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Memorandum of compromise placed on record.

Parvathi Devi .K Vs The Special District Revenue Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.5847 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 29.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.5847 of 2023

K.Parvathi Devi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition, NH 744, Camp Office, Kadayanallur, Tenkasi District.

¶11

2.The Special District Officer/Tahsildar Office, Land Acquisition-NH 744, Camp Office, Collector Office Campus, Virudhunagar-626 002.

¶12

3.NRSK.Pandian

¶13

4.B.Subbulakshmi

¶14

5.R.Mageswari

¶15

6.P.Nataraja Perumal ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1^st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 1.02.2023 and direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to call for all the parties interest in the property situated at

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

W.P(MD)No.5847 of 2023

¶20

survey number 435/2 measuring an extent of Hectares 1.19.8 ares at Thirumalai Naicken pudukudi village, within the Puliyankudi Municipal limit, Tenkasi District which was acquisitioned by way of notification dated 21.05.2021 as per Section 3(A)(1) of National Highways Act, 1956 and disburse the compensation amount as per their respective shares with regard to the said property.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balamurugan

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the issue has been amicably resolved. It is also stated that the memorandum of compromise has been entered into. He wants to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the memo of compromise is placed on record. No costs.

¶25

29.07.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

W.P(MD)No.5847 of 2023

¶29

¶30

1.The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition, NH 744, Camp Office, Kadayanallur, Tenkasi District.

¶31

2.The Special District Officer/Tahsildar Office, Land Acquisition-NH 744, Camp Office, Collector Office Campus, Virudhunagar-626 002.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/4

¶34

W.P(MD)No.5847 of 2023

¶35

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶36

rmi

¶37

W.P(MD)No.5847 of 2023

¶38

29.07.2024

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Parvathi Devi .K v. The Special District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvathi Devi .K v. The Special District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santhanam Vs The Inspector of Police

Kamatchi. P Vs The District Registrar

Kamatchi .P Vs The District Collector

Manju Vs The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Irdai)

Jeyalakshmi J Vs The Commissioner of Police

Murugesan Vs The Thasildar