U.Gandhi v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition sought to restrain authorities from granting a licence or NOC for constructing an IOCL retail outlet. IOCL reported the ninth respondent's application was found ineligible, so no cause of action remained and the court closed the petition without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.11830 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.11830 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)No.10549 of 2024
U.Gandhi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Union of India represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas Government of India Shastri Bhavan New Delhi-110 001.
- 2.The Deputy General Manager (Petroleum) Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 139, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam.
- 3.The Divisional Manager, Madurai Division Office No.2, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Madurai Division, Madurai, Tamil Nadu-625 002.
- 4.The District Collector, Ramanthapuram District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
U.Gandhi
- respondent
Union of India represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
- respondent
The Deputy General Manager (Petroleum) Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
The Divisional Manager, Madurai Division Office No.2, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
The District Collector, Ramanthapuram District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court