Thirumalaisamy. T v. The Thasildar
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS…
What did the court decide?
Recall denied; clarified that survey order does not authorise fencing; stay petition closed.
of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS…
Recall denied; clarified that survey order does not authorise fencing; stay petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD) No.8091 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Friday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN WMP(MD). Nos.9885 and 9886 of 2024
in
WP(MD) No.8091 of 2024
T.Thirumalaisamy ... Petitioner/2nd Respondent
Vs
1 The Thasildar Palani Taluk, Dindigul District. 2 P.Subramaniyan ... Respondents 1 & 2/Respondents 1 &3 3 N.Nareshkumar ... 3rd Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer in WMP(MD). Nos.9885 of 2024
Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to recall the order passed by this Honble Court in WP(MD).No.8091 of 2024 dated 28.03.2024 and dismiss the writ petition in WP(MD).No.8091 of 2024 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice.
1/4
WP(MD) No.8091 of 2024
Prayer in WMP(MD). 9886/ 2024 :
Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order passed by this Honble Court in WP(MD).No.8091 of 2024 dated 28.03.2024 pending disposal of the above recall petition and thus render justice.
Prayer in WP(MD). 8091/ 2024 :
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to survey and fix boundaries of the petitioners land in Survey No.347/2B2 situated at Puliyampatti Village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District, based on his representation dated 22.08.2022, with necessary police protection and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
ORDER:- These Petition are coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing
the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.D.Venkatesh, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr.D.Sasikumar, Additional Government Pleader for the 1st Respondent, and of Mr.J.Jeyakumaran, Advocate for the 3rd Respondent, this Court made the following order:
Heard both sides.
direction. Seeking recall of the said order, the present miscellaneous petition has https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
WP(MD) No.8091 of 2024
been filed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CO)
// True Copy //
/08/2024 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-I , II , III, IV)
rmi
3/4
WP(MD) No.8091 of 2024
TO
The Thasildar Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.
ORDER DATED : 07/06/2024
========================== ORDER
==========================
WMP(MD). No.9885 & 9886 of 2024 in WP(MD) No.8091 of 2024
Giving direction and etc. as stated within.
SL(27.08.2024)/ 4P/ 4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 28.03.2024 directing a survey should be recalled, and whether the survey direction permits fencing by the writ petitioner?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Thirumalaisamy
The Thasildar Palani Taluk, Dindigul District
P.Subramaniyan
N.Nareshkumar
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court