Disposed

Senthilkumar. M v. The Commissioner

Madras HC4 Jul 2024WP(MD)/11199/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order appointing a fit person. The High Court granted a stay pending the disposal of a separate application filed under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Act, keeping the impugned order in abeyance for four months.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order is kept in abeyance for four months pending the disposal of O.A.No.9 of 2023.

Senthilkumar. M Vs The Commissioner — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.11199 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.11199 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.9968 and 9969 of 2024

¶8

M.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai.

¶11

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai.

¶12

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Virudhunagar District.

¶13

4.The Executive Officer, A/m Chokkanathaswamy Thirukovil, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in Che.Mu.Na.Ka.No. 3722/2021/A4 dated 09.06.2022 and the consequential order passed by the fourth respondent dated 06.05.2024 and quash the same.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Page No. 1 of 5

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.11199 of 2024

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Writ Petition is disposed of without making any observation on the merits of the case.

¶21

2 . In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned

¶22

order of the third respondent in Che.Mu.Na.Ka.No.3722/2021/A4 dated 09.06.2022 and the consequential order passed by the fourth respondent dated 06.05.2024. By the first mentioned order, the fourth respondent has been appointed as a Fit Person.

¶23

3 . The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

¶24

is now restricting the prayer in this Writ Petition for keeping the impugned order in abeyance pending disposal of O.A.No.9 of 2023 filed by him under Section 64(1) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable

¶25

and Endowments Act, 1959.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 2 of 5_

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.11199 of 2024

¶28

4 . The learned Special Government Pleader for the official

¶29

respondents submits that the O.A. filed by the petitioner in O.A.No.9 of 2023 under Section 64(1) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Act, 1959 pending before the Joint Commissioner, Madurai, the second respondent herein will be disposed of within a period of four months from the date of receipt a copy of this order.

¶30

5 . Under these circumstances, the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four months from today and thereafter, subject to further orders in O.A.No.9 of 2023 filed by the petitioner under Section 64(1) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Act, 1959 before the second respondent herein.

¶31

6 . This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction.

¶32

No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶33

Index : Yes/ No 04.07.2024 Neutral Citation: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order smn2

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 3 of 5_

¶35

W.P.(MD) No.11199 of 2024

¶36

¶37

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai.

¶38

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai.

¶39

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Virudhunagar District.

¶40

4.The Executive Officer, A/m Chokkanathaswamy Thirukovil, Virudhunagar.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 4 of 5_

¶42

W.P.(MD) No.11199 of 2024

¶43

C.SARAVANAN, J.

¶44

smn2

¶45

W.P.(MD) No.11199 of 2024

¶46

04.07.2024

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 5 of 5_

Senthilkumar. M v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthilkumar. M v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Ohm Srinivasa paper Boards Pvt.Ltd., Vs The Assistant Commissioner of central GSt and Central Excise

Chakra Club Vs The State Tax Officer - 1

M/s.Geetha Store Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer - II

Subathra Devi. P Vs Ravichandran. R

Guru Star Recreation Club Vs The State Tax Officer (Data Cell)

S Anand Sathya Vs The Superintendent Of Cgst and Central Excise